MissionLegal CasesThe LitigatorAction Update Mountain States Legal Foundation
MSLF Board
MSLF StaffLinksReturn to Home Page
Public AppearancesContact UsContribute
Press ReleasesLegal AssistanceSummary JudgmentPlanned Giving

Go to Legal Cases Home Page

WILDEARTH GUARDIANS v. SALAZAR

Arizona
Issue: Whether the listing or delisting of a species may be limited to only those portions of the species’ range in which the species requires protection?

Plaintiff: WildEarth Guardians

Defendant: Ken Salazar, U.S. Secretary of the Interior

Amicus Curiae: Arizona Cattle Growers’ Association and New Mexico Cattle Growers’ Association

Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona (No. 09cv574)

Status: The Cattle Growers Associations filed their amicus brief on December 16, 2009, and briefing on cross-motions for summary judgment is completed.

Next Event: Decision on cross-motions for summary judgment

History: On February 5, 2008, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) issued a 12-month finding regarding the petition to list the Gunnison’s prairie dog (Cynomys gunnisoni) as a threatened or endangered species. In its determination, the FWS found that the species was not endangered or threatened throughout all of its range. It also found, however, that the portion of the current range of the species in central and south-central Colorado and north-central New Mexico represents a significant portion of the range where the species warrants listing, but that listing is precluded by higher priority actions. Thus, the FWS found that listing is not warranted in the “prairie” range of the species and is warranted but precluded in the “montane” portion of its range.

On March 24, 2009, WildEarth Guardians filed suit challenging FWS’s listing determination. Specifically, WildEarth Guardians challenged the FWS’s decision to limit listing to only the montane portion of the Gunnison’s prairie dog’s range and the FWS’s “warranted but precluded” finding with respect to the montane portion of the species’ range. As in other cases, the FWS relied heavily upon a 2007 Solicitor’s Opinion that authorizes the FWS to list a species in only that portion of its range in which protections are necessary.

On October 9, 2009, MSLF filed its motion to intervene on behalf of the Arizona Cattle Growers’ Association and New Mexico Cattle Growers’ Association. That motion was denied on November 25, 2009. On November 25, 2009, the Court granted the Cattle Growers' Associations permission to file an amicus brief.




Copyright - Mountain States Legal Foundation 1999 [Privacy Statement]
2596 South Lewis Way
Lakewood, Colorado 80227
[View County Map]  [View Local Map]
(303) 292-2021 or By E-mail

Mountain States Legal Foundation (MSLF) is a nonprofit, public interest law firm dedicated to individual liberty, the right to own and use property, limited and ethical government, and free enterprise system. It is an Internal Revenue Code 501(c)(3) entity incorporated in the State of Colorado. Contributions to Mountain States Legal Foundation are tax deductible.
MSLF's tax-identification number is 84-0736725

[Mission] [Press Releases] [Legal Cases] [Legal Assistance ]
[Contribute to MSLF] [The Litigator] [Action Updates] [Summary Judgment]
[Join MSLF's Email List] [Planned Giving]
[MSLF Board] [MSLF Staff] [Links] [Contact MSLF]
[Public Appearances] [Return to Home Page]